Analyse Form: Simplified Figures
This exercise asked to break the figure into connected cylinders. I found this very useful for simplifying the shape and is a method which I will use in the future to simplify the shapes. If this is done in your initial sketches I think it's more likely that the proportions will be right and the angles will be correct.
I then added tone to the cylinders to give them a roundness. The charcoal sketch has worked better for this I think.
Check and Log
Look at your drawings and note down what you have learned from this exercise in your learning log how you experienced this exercise.
I have learned an effective technique of establishing the main shapes of the figure with this exercise. I think it's an observational change, rather than looking at the model and thinking of them as a rounded form with arms and legs and shadows and highlights, it helps to simplify that data into cylinders from which you can examine and decide the overall position of each of the limbs in relation to the rest of the body. I found this very useful and hopefully I can use this techniques at the initial stages of a sketch even if only very lightly or indeed just in my head.
Friday, 2 March 2012
Thursday, 1 March 2012
Assignment 5 - research - David, Ingres, Degas
The brief asks to look at the work of Ingres, David and Degas to
examine their linear elements. I am very familiar with Ingres and David
as I studied French Neoclassical painters in high school. Even though it
was such a long time ago I remember being so impressed with the way
they painted the human form. This was probably when I first discovered
my love of figurative art. A few years later, I was very lucky to go to
the Louvre to see these paintings and was in awe at the size of them and
the amount of work that had gone into these highly rendered paintings.
Jaques-Louis David (1748 - 1825)
He was thought to be one of the most important painters of the French Neoclassical era. He was influenced with the Italian masters, particularly Raphael and he wanted to participate in the Classical revival that was occurring at the time. His work shows how he believed that simplicity of line was central to the classical ideal in drawing.
Later he became involved with political events and was a supporter of the attack against Louis XVI and the French Revolution. His paintings became propaganda for this cause.
The sketch above was a depiction of an oath taken by
the National Assembly which was performed in a makeshift conference room
inside a tennis court. It signified the first time that French citizens
formally stood in opposition to Louis XVI.
Marat, a friend of David and member of the National
Assembly was murdered in his bath and this, one of his most famous
paintings has been called the PietĂ of the revolution and created a
political martyr in Marat.
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres 1780 - 1867
Ingres was also a French Neoclassical painter and a staunch advocate of the classical style. He was very resistant to the emerging popularity of the romantic movement. He studied with David in Paris.
Degas (1834–1917)
Degas met Ingres, whom he revered, and whose advice he never forgot: "Draw lines, young man, and still more lines, both from life and from memory, and you will become a good artist."
He is most well known for his fascination with picturing movement and paintings of ballet dancers. He is also one of the first artist to use photography as a tool in his art. He is often called an impressionist painter but this is a label he rejected as he felt he did not work spontaneously and would criticise those artists working en plein air.
Looking at all of these artists and their drawings it is possible to see the importance of line for these artists through the very simplicity of the contours.
David Drawings
Ingres Drawings
Degas drawings
Degas is much looser than the others but his absolute importance of obtaining the accurate contours of the human figure is clear.
In order to show the difference I looked out a couple of drawings from other artists for which line was less important that form. Seurat was fascinated with tonal differences and his drawings contained few lines. Van Gogh was interested in texture and technique and Matisse's painting below shows his interest in tone and colour.
Jaques-Louis David (1748 - 1825)
He was thought to be one of the most important painters of the French Neoclassical era. He was influenced with the Italian masters, particularly Raphael and he wanted to participate in the Classical revival that was occurring at the time. His work shows how he believed that simplicity of line was central to the classical ideal in drawing.
![]() |
David - The Oath of the Horatii (1784-85) 329 x 424cm |
Later he became involved with political events and was a supporter of the attack against Louis XVI and the French Revolution. His paintings became propaganda for this cause.
![]() |
David -Sketch for Oath of the Tennis Court (1789) 101x66cm |
![]() |
David - Death of Marat (1793) 165 x 128cm |
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres 1780 - 1867
Ingres was also a French Neoclassical painter and a staunch advocate of the classical style. He was very resistant to the emerging popularity of the romantic movement. He studied with David in Paris.
![]() |
Inges - Le Grande Odalisque 1814 |
Degas (1834–1917)
Degas met Ingres, whom he revered, and whose advice he never forgot: "Draw lines, young man, and still more lines, both from life and from memory, and you will become a good artist."
He is most well known for his fascination with picturing movement and paintings of ballet dancers. He is also one of the first artist to use photography as a tool in his art. He is often called an impressionist painter but this is a label he rejected as he felt he did not work spontaneously and would criticise those artists working en plein air.
![]() |
The Dance Class (La Classe de Danse),1873–1876, oil on canvas, |
![]() |
La Toilette (Woman Combing Her Hair), c. 1884–1886, pastel on paper |
Looking at all of these artists and their drawings it is possible to see the importance of line for these artists through the very simplicity of the contours.
David Drawings
Ingres Drawings
Degas drawings
Degas is much looser than the others but his absolute importance of obtaining the accurate contours of the human figure is clear.
In order to show the difference I looked out a couple of drawings from other artists for which line was less important that form. Seurat was fascinated with tonal differences and his drawings contained few lines. Van Gogh was interested in texture and technique and Matisse's painting below shows his interest in tone and colour.
![]() |
Van Gogh - Portrait of Joseph Roulin |
![]() |
Seurat - Artist's Mother |
![]() |
Andre Derain by Matisse 1905 oil 55x47cm |
Assignment 5 - Drawing Figures - Line drawing of the whole figure
Line drawing of the whole figure
I'd been caught out by this task before in previous sections, so this time I was determined I was going to do a proper line drawing and not get embroiled in detail and shading.
When I actually set down to do this I found it quite easy and satisfying and I'm quite pleased with the result. This technique of concentrating on line and contours is something I would never have done previous to this course and I think it's been a really useful exercise to help me establish the correct proportions in a drawing.
I'd been caught out by this task before in previous sections, so this time I was determined I was going to do a proper line drawing and not get embroiled in detail and shading.
When I actually set down to do this I found it quite easy and satisfying and I'm quite pleased with the result. This technique of concentrating on line and contours is something I would never have done previous to this course and I think it's been a really useful exercise to help me establish the correct proportions in a drawing.
Saturday, 25 February 2012
Assignment 5 - Research Point - Giacometti/ Hockney
Giacometti
Alberto Giacometti (1901-1966) was a Swiss sculptor, painter, draughtsman, and print maker. He is known for his distinctive elongated figures both in sculpture and paintings.
His portraits are as distinctive as his sculptures. He would repeatedly draw over the same lines and rework lines while erasing others until the paper would become worn underneath. He typically would draw his sitter front on and and use a rapid energetic technique encircling the eyes with heavy lines.It looks like he has drawn the figure using a continuous line as in this exercise, possibly not looking at the paper much while drawing or lifting the pen from the surface. His lines are full of energy and action e.g the lines describing the sitters neck in the drawing below (Portrait d'homme) are very expressive and appear to have been carried out in seconds with little effort but are hugely descriptive.
The above portrait of James Lord took Giacometti 18
straight days of sitting to complete. He reworked and reworked the
figure till he was happy. The sitter, James Lord wrote a book about his
experience and Giacometti's technique. I've not read it but it's
definitely on the list for the future.
From looking on the web it seems that Giacometti had a specific technique for drawing and painting figures. I've not been able to find out specifically what this was but he was certainly interested in the space around the sitter and how they are placed in it. He often included horizontal and vertical lines in the background which seem to place the figure in the setting but with no detail. I would definitely like to find out more about this and try to understand what he was trying to achieve.
Hockney
David Hockney (born 1937) is described as one of the most influential British artists of the twentieth century. He is most famous for his Pop art paintings of the 60s and 70s predominantly concentrating on figures but recently he has become known for his large landscape works and his use of digital media to create works of art. He currently has a major exhibition at the Royal Academy of Arts of new landscape works. This exhibition includes vivid large-scale paintings inspired by the East Yorkshire landscape and a display of his iPad drawings. Recently the OCA held a study day at this exhibition and there is a report of this on the website.
I hadn't really seen many of Hockney's drawing before and I found them quite interesting in their style. I found many examples of "contour drawing" style where he has described the outlines of the figure but there is no shading. They couldn't be more different from Giacometti's style of over laying lines on top of each other and never erasing anything. I find Hockney's style to be quite deliberate and thought out which is very different from Giacometti. Interestingly from what I can gather, while Giacometti appeared to work quickly and very spontaneously and Hockney seems more rigid and slow, Hockey is a very fast worker while Giacometti would work and rework and spend a lot of time pondering his drawings.
These drawings have pared the figures down to their
essential elements. Small lines can describe the fold in clothing
perfectly and uninteresting sections are just left blank.
Later Hockney starts to draw portraits with more detail but sometimes keeps the work on the face but leaves the rest of the body with very little detail.
![]() |
Giacometti Standing Woman 1958-9 |
![]() |
Giacometti Caroline 1965 |
Alberto Giacometti (1901-1966) was a Swiss sculptor, painter, draughtsman, and print maker. He is known for his distinctive elongated figures both in sculpture and paintings.
His portraits are as distinctive as his sculptures. He would repeatedly draw over the same lines and rework lines while erasing others until the paper would become worn underneath. He typically would draw his sitter front on and and use a rapid energetic technique encircling the eyes with heavy lines.It looks like he has drawn the figure using a continuous line as in this exercise, possibly not looking at the paper much while drawing or lifting the pen from the surface. His lines are full of energy and action e.g the lines describing the sitters neck in the drawing below (Portrait d'homme) are very expressive and appear to have been carried out in seconds with little effort but are hugely descriptive.
![]() |
Giacometti Portrait d'homme |
![]() |
Giacometti Femme debout et tĂȘte d'homme, 1960-63, |
![]() |
Giacometti Silvio 1950 |
![]() |
Giacometti Tete d'homme I (Diego) 1964 |
![]() |
Portrait De Jean Genet 1955 |
![]() |
Giacometti - James Lord |
From looking on the web it seems that Giacometti had a specific technique for drawing and painting figures. I've not been able to find out specifically what this was but he was certainly interested in the space around the sitter and how they are placed in it. He often included horizontal and vertical lines in the background which seem to place the figure in the setting but with no detail. I would definitely like to find out more about this and try to understand what he was trying to achieve.
Hockney
David Hockney (born 1937) is described as one of the most influential British artists of the twentieth century. He is most famous for his Pop art paintings of the 60s and 70s predominantly concentrating on figures but recently he has become known for his large landscape works and his use of digital media to create works of art. He currently has a major exhibition at the Royal Academy of Arts of new landscape works. This exhibition includes vivid large-scale paintings inspired by the East Yorkshire landscape and a display of his iPad drawings. Recently the OCA held a study day at this exhibition and there is a report of this on the website.
I hadn't really seen many of Hockney's drawing before and I found them quite interesting in their style. I found many examples of "contour drawing" style where he has described the outlines of the figure but there is no shading. They couldn't be more different from Giacometti's style of over laying lines on top of each other and never erasing anything. I find Hockney's style to be quite deliberate and thought out which is very different from Giacometti. Interestingly from what I can gather, while Giacometti appeared to work quickly and very spontaneously and Hockney seems more rigid and slow, Hockey is a very fast worker while Giacometti would work and rework and spend a lot of time pondering his drawings.
![]() | ||||
Hockney - Charles Alan 1969 ink 17x14 in |
![]() |
Hockney - Sheridan sleeping and cushion 1968 |
Later Hockney starts to draw portraits with more detail but sometimes keeps the work on the face but leaves the rest of the body with very little detail.
![]() |
Hockney - Portrait Henry XI 1985 pencil 30x22in |
![]() |
Hockney - Jeff Burkhart 1994 crayon 30x22in |
Assignment 5 - Drawing Figures - Continuous Line, Giacometti, Hockney
Continuous Line
I enjoyed this task, it was good fun to try and draw the figure without looking at the paper. It was really difficult to stop myself glancing down, it was automatic to look at the paper. I used a variety of pens or pencils but I found that pens were better and gave more movement.
Check and Log
1. This challenging exercise is likely to frustrate you. Instead of worrying about it reflect on what you have gained from it and make notes in your learning log.
I found overall my drawings were OK but sometimes I would look down and I had got something completely wrong. I found this particularly with the facial features. I guess this was because I must have been lifting the pen off the paper too much without realising, in order to place the features in the middle of the face.
In some of the drawings I tried to show the shadows in order to help describe the form but I found this didn't work very well with this technique. I noticed that it was sometimes helpful to concentrate on the negative spaces which helped to pick out the forms correctly. I also found that using a wiggly line to draw the folds in clothes was quite effective to show the form.
Overall this technique was really good to help me pick out the important shapes in a quick way. A figure can be described with sometimes only a few lines and this section helped to focus the mind on the essential lines. I found that I wanted to go over the same area again and I had to try to stop myself doing this as it would create a mess and ruin the first lines.
2. Find some examples of artists such as Giacometti and David Hockney, who work fluidly with loose line and note them down for reference.
See research point in next post...
I enjoyed this task, it was good fun to try and draw the figure without looking at the paper. It was really difficult to stop myself glancing down, it was automatic to look at the paper. I used a variety of pens or pencils but I found that pens were better and gave more movement.
1. This challenging exercise is likely to frustrate you. Instead of worrying about it reflect on what you have gained from it and make notes in your learning log.
I found overall my drawings were OK but sometimes I would look down and I had got something completely wrong. I found this particularly with the facial features. I guess this was because I must have been lifting the pen off the paper too much without realising, in order to place the features in the middle of the face.
In some of the drawings I tried to show the shadows in order to help describe the form but I found this didn't work very well with this technique. I noticed that it was sometimes helpful to concentrate on the negative spaces which helped to pick out the forms correctly. I also found that using a wiggly line to draw the folds in clothes was quite effective to show the form.
Overall this technique was really good to help me pick out the important shapes in a quick way. A figure can be described with sometimes only a few lines and this section helped to focus the mind on the essential lines. I found that I wanted to go over the same area again and I had to try to stop myself doing this as it would create a mess and ruin the first lines.
2. Find some examples of artists such as Giacometti and David Hockney, who work fluidly with loose line and note them down for reference.
See research point in next post...
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
Assignment 5 - Drawing Figures - Quick Studies
Quick Studies
For this assignment I chose to go back to figure drawing. Some the other subjects might have been easier, both logistically because I need a model and also small mistakes seem so much more noticeable in figure drawing. This is, however, the subject I enjoy drawing and painting most and I think when you enjoy it you're more likely to do it better.
I like these short sketches as they are easier for me to fit in when I get a spare half hour (not very often at the moment) but I had to chop and change my models because of this.
I tried to keep these sketches as short as possible but I would invariable lose track of time. I tried to be as fast as I could.
Check and Log
1. Think about and write up the challenges you met in doing these studies
The biggest challenge was to draw fast and get the essential lines down fast and then leave it. I find it hard to do this and some of them are too detailed which defeats the purpose. I think this is a skill in itself and I do think that I am much better at this than I used to be.
2. In what way has your drawing improved from earlier assignments?
To continue from the above question, I think I'm faster than I used to be. I seem to be able to judge sizes and angles better so that I don't have to rework things as often. This is something that I have noticed throughout the course compared with previous courses and it's so rewarding to be able to draw more accurately
3. What are your current biggest challenges in drawing figures?
My biggest challenge is the face, I really struggle to get the face to look like the person I'm drawing. It's very frustrating. In the past I've had problems with limb lengths and angles or foreshortening but I always find that if I keep looking I'll eventually get it right. The face however is so hard to do this. It's easier on a larger scale as you can measure easier but if the face is smaller e.g. on a full figure study I find it very difficult to draw a couple of lines and pick out the features accurately.
For this assignment I chose to go back to figure drawing. Some the other subjects might have been easier, both logistically because I need a model and also small mistakes seem so much more noticeable in figure drawing. This is, however, the subject I enjoy drawing and painting most and I think when you enjoy it you're more likely to do it better.
I like these short sketches as they are easier for me to fit in when I get a spare half hour (not very often at the moment) but I had to chop and change my models because of this.
I tried to keep these sketches as short as possible but I would invariable lose track of time. I tried to be as fast as I could.
Check and Log
1. Think about and write up the challenges you met in doing these studies
The biggest challenge was to draw fast and get the essential lines down fast and then leave it. I find it hard to do this and some of them are too detailed which defeats the purpose. I think this is a skill in itself and I do think that I am much better at this than I used to be.
2. In what way has your drawing improved from earlier assignments?
To continue from the above question, I think I'm faster than I used to be. I seem to be able to judge sizes and angles better so that I don't have to rework things as often. This is something that I have noticed throughout the course compared with previous courses and it's so rewarding to be able to draw more accurately
3. What are your current biggest challenges in drawing figures?
My biggest challenge is the face, I really struggle to get the face to look like the person I'm drawing. It's very frustrating. In the past I've had problems with limb lengths and angles or foreshortening but I always find that if I keep looking I'll eventually get it right. The face however is so hard to do this. It's easier on a larger scale as you can measure easier but if the face is smaller e.g. on a full figure study I find it very difficult to draw a couple of lines and pick out the features accurately.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)